Compare Page

Completeness of optional attributes

Characteristic Name: Completeness of optional attributes
Dimension: Completeness
Description: Optional attributes should not contain invalid null values
Granularity: Element
Implementation Type: Rule-based approach
Characteristic Type: Declarative

Verification Metric:

The number of invalid null values reported in an optional attribute per thousand records

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines: Scenario:
Provide default values for each valid case of null values for the attribute in concern so that null values occur only for actually missing values which are invalid cases for the attribute in concern. Case1: Attribute values that are not defined for a particular entity instance (e.g.: Maiden name of unmarried women ) Such instances will get the default value “NOT DEFINED”

Case2 : Attribute values that are defined for the entity instance whereas the real value for the attribute instance is null (eg: Vehicle number of a student who does not have a vehicle) Such instances will get the default value “NOT EXIST”

Case3: Attribute values are defined for the entity instance and the attribute instance should have a value (Student’s date of birth).

Validation Metric:

How mature is the creation and implementation of the DQ rules to define valid null cases

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example: Source:
Let us consider a Person relation with the attributes Name, Surname,

BirthDate,and Email. The relation is shown in Figure 2.2. For the tuples with Id equalto2,3,and 4, the Email value is NULL. Let us suppose that the person represented by tuple 2 has no e-mail: no incompleteness case occurs. If the person represented by tuple 3 has an e-mail, but its value is not known then tuple 3 presents an incompleteness. Finally, if it is not known whether the person represented by tuple 4 has an e-mail or not, incompleteness may not be the case.

ID 1

2 3 4

Name John

Edward Anthony Marianne

Surname Smith

Monroe White Collins

BirthDate 03/17/1974 02/03/1967 01/01/1936 11/20/1955

Email

smith@abc.it NULL NULL NULL

not existing existing but unknown not known if existing

Fig. 2.2. The Person relation, with different null value meanings for the e-mail attribute

C. Batini and M, Scannapieco, “Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies, and Techniques”, Springer, 2006.
1) A database contains information on repairs done to capital equipment. How- ever, it is a known fact that sometimes the repairs are done and the informa- tion about the repair is just not entered into the database. This is the result of lack of concern on the part of the repair people and a lack of enforcement on the part of their supervisors. It is estimated that the amount of missing information is about 5%. This database is probably a good-quality database for assessing the genral health of capital equipment. Equipment that required a great deal of expense to maintain can be identified from the data. Unless the missing data is disproportionately skewed, the records are usable for all ordinary decisions. However, trying to use it as a base for evaluating information makes it a low-quality database. The missing transactions could easily tag an important piece of equipment as satisfying a warranty when in fact it does not.

2) A blank for COLLEGE_LAST_ATTENDED may be accurate or inaccurate. If the person it applied to had attended college, it would be inaccurate. This is another case of valid but not accurate.

J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition: Source:
1) A null value is a missing value. However, a value that is missing may provide more information than one might think because there may be different reason that it is missing. A null value might actually represent an unavailable value, an attribute that is not applicable for this entity, or no value in the attribute’s domain that correctly classifies this entity. Of course, the value may actually be missing.

2) When the null value (or absence of a value) is required for an attribute, there should be a recognizable form for presenting that null value that does not conflict with any valid values.

LOSHIN, D. 2001. Enterprise knowledge management: The data quality approach, Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
1) Ability to distinguish neatly (without ambiguities) null and default values from applicable values of the domain.

2) Completeness refers to the degree to which values are present in a data collection, as for as an individual datum is concerned, only two situations are possible: Either a value is assigned to the attribute in question or not. In the latter case, null, a special element of an attribute’s domain can be assigned as the attribute’s value. Depending on whether the attribute is mandatory, optional, or inapplicable, null can mean different things.

REDMAN, T. C. 1997. Data quality for the information age, Artech House, Inc.

 

Meta-data compliance

Characteristic Name: Meta-data compliance
Dimension: Validity
Description: Data should comply with its metadata
Granularity: Element
Implementation Type: Rule-based approach
Characteristic Type: Declarative

Verification Metric:

The number of meta-data violations reported in an attribute per thousand records

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines: Scenario:
Domains should be specified by considering all possible value patterns, cases and usage needs which is applicable for a data attribute. (1) Eg: It is easy to maintain the order number as a numeric value since it can be easily incremented (10000, 10001, and 10002). But it can be also defined as alphanumeric in order to distinguish special cases (10000R is a return order of sales order 10000)
Maintain valid values/value ranges/Value lists for attributes. (1) Gender can be M or F
(2) Country is taken from the existing list of countries
(3) Birth date cannot be a future value.
(4) Salary range for level 4 employees must be between $40000-60000
Usage of number ranges for critical data elements (1) Sales orders 10000001 to 1999999
(2) Purchase orders 50000001 to 59999999
Maintain the possible synonyms and abbreviations which could be accepted as valid values (1) Post Box , PO BOX, BOX etc.
Explicitly mention what values, characters are not permitted in the attribute (1) User Name can contain only A-Z
(2) No blank spaces are allowed for credit card number
Explicitly mention the minimum /maximum number of characters, or any other requirements such as case sensitivity, that an attribute value should meet (1) Password should contain minimum of 8 characters including one numeric and one capital
Maintain values based on specific formats as defined by the stakeholders, standards, best practices or agreements. (1) Time should be in 24 hour clock
(2) Date should be in DD/MM/YYYY
Appropriate measurement scale should be maintained against quantities and volumes (1) Currency for Price values
Kg/g/mg for weights
litres for volumes
(2) Data Dictionary , Data catalog
Documentation for Meta-Data is available online for the users (1) Data Dictionary , Data catalog

Validation Metric:

How mature is the creation and implementation of the DQ rules to define meta-data

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example: Source:
1) A new year 9 teacher, Sally Hearn (without a middle name) is appointed therefore there are only two initials. A decision must be made as to how to represent two initials or the rule will fail and the database will reject the class identifier of “SH09”. It is decided that an additional character “Z” will be added to pad the letters to 3: “SZH09”, however this could break the accuracy rule. A better solution would be to amend the database to accept 2 or 3 initials and 1 or 2 numbers.

2) The age at entry to a UK primary & junior school is captured on the form for school applications. This is entered into a database and checked that it is between 4 and 11. If it were captured on the form as 14 or N/A it would be rejected as invalid.

N. Askham, et al., “The Six Primary Dimensions for Data Quality Assessment: Defining Data Quality Dimensions”, DAMA UK Working Group, 2013.
the answer to the query “What is Mr. Wat- son% telephone number?” can bl: validated against the format for telephone numbers. Additionally, Wat- son’s address might be used to vallidate the area code and exchange M. Brodie, “Data Quality in Information Systems”, North-Holland Publishing Company Information and Management 3, 1980, pp. 245-258.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition: Source:
Determines the extent to which data conforms to a specified format. For example, the order date must be in the format YYYY/MM/DD. D. McGilvray, “Executing Data Quality Projects: Ten Steps to Quality Data and Trusted Information”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2008.
1) Data element passes all edits for acceptability and is free from variation and contradiction based on the condition of another data element (a valid value combination).

2) The metadata of the data element clearly states or defines the purpose of the data element, or the values used in the data element can be understood by metadata or data inspection. The metadata of the entity clearly states or defines the purpose of the entity and its required attributes/domains.

B. BYRNE, J. K., D. MCCARTY, G. SAUTER, H. SMITH, P WORCESTER 2008. The information perspective of SOA design Part 6:The value of applying the data quality analysis pattern in SOA. IBM corporation.
1) A data value is a Valid Value or within a specified range of valid values for this data element.

2) Data values are consistent with the Attribute (Fact) definition.

ENGLISH, L. P. 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing.
This dimension refers to whether instances of data are represented in a format that is consistent with the domain of values and with other similar attribute values. For example, the display of time in a non-military (12-hour) format may be confusing if all other instances of times in the system are displayed in the 24-hour military format. LOSHIN, D. 2001. Enterprise knowledge management: The data quality approach, Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
This dimension refers to whether instances of data are either store, exchanged, or presented in a format that is consistent with the domain of values, as well as consistent with other similar attribute values. Each column has numerous metadata attributes associated with it: its data type, precision, format patterns, use of a predefined enumeration of values, domain ranges, underlying storage formats, etc. LOSHIN, D. 2006. Monitoring Data quality Performance using Data Quality Metrics. Informatica Corporation.
Appropriate metadata is available to define, constrain, and document data. PRICE, R. J. & SHANKS, G. Empirical refinement of a semiotic information quality framework. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005. IEEE, 216a-216a.
Representation consistency refers to whether physical instances of data are in record with their formats. For example, an EMPLOYEE’s salary cannot be represented “$AXT,” as there is (or should be) no such element in S. One would often like to know whether a physical instance is the proper representation for the intended (correct) value. But in practice this is rarely possible, as the intended value is conceptual and not known. So one is left with the issue of whether the representation conflicts with S. REDMAN, T. C. 1997. Data quality for the information age, Artech House, Inc.